Posted by: Ticktock | July 2, 2008

Sunscreen Dangers!

Environmental Working Group has catalogued and analyzed hundreds of sunscreens in their Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database.  They’ve just released a report detailing their conclusions from many years of testing the products and reviewing the available scientific literature, and in the report they say that four out of five sunscreen products don’t meet their standards for safety and effectiveness (a claim disputed by the major companies).  Ouch.

The report doesn’t look pretty, but I will add a caveat that the concerns they have are speculative and based on their interpretation of available evidence and not completely on definitive knowledge.  That being said, sunscreens fall into the same category of concern that I gave to bugspray, antibacterial soap, and baby bottles; that is to say that I’m willing to take precautions based on informed specualtion if it means my kids will potentially be healthier.

Imagine my surprise discovering that my family’s Coppertone Continuous Spray Sunscreen is not completely effective and possibly hazardous to our health.  According to Environmental Working Group (EWG), I’m spraying ingredients on my children that are cancerous, toxic to reproduction and development, immunotoxic, neurotoxic, and organ system toxic.  Sweet.

OK, so what the heck is going on?  EWG tested 952 sunscreen products and only 15% met their criteria for safety and effectiveness.  Among the worst of the troublemakers were everybody’s favorite brands: coppertone, banana boat, and neutrogena.  You might be wondering how these companies are getting away with selling unhealthy toxins that don’t work very well.  Good question.  According to EWG, the FDA has been drafting sunscreen safety standards for 30 years, but has yet to enforce any of their suggestions for voluntary standards.  Without mandatory standards, the companies are having a field day making claims that they don’t have to prove, and many of the claims that they do make are apparently fraudulent.  This gives these companies a shield to hide behind, to say that they are complying with the FDA.

The majority of sunscreens go wrong because they don’t offer the full spectrum of UV protection.  There are two types of ultra violet sun radiation called UVA and UVB.  Most sunscreens prevent sunburns by blocking UVB radiation, but they don’t do a good job blocking the UVA rays that likely cause wrinkles and skin cancer.

IN addition, many of the ingredients in sunscreens are rendered inert when exposed to sunlight.  You read that right.  This is so unbelievable that I almost refuse to believe it.  Yet EWG claims that 40% of the tested sunscreens have ingredients that break down in sunlight after a short period of time.  Super.

And back to my favorite Coppertone Continuous Spray, EWG is mildly concerned about it’s mixture of nanoparticles that could be absorbed by the lungs.  They say that if the FDA would only approve certain ingredients that Europe approved long ago, our continuous spray (and sunscreens in general) would be much safer.  I don’t understand how the FDA can approve all of these other random toxins, but not ingredients that our brothers in Europe have deemed safe long ago.

So what sunscreens do EWG recommend?  Well, you can check out the sunscreens that they rated least toxic and most effective or you can go straight to Keys Soap Solar Rx Therapeutic Sunblock (SPF 30), which is the highest rated, safest, and most effective sunscreen they tested (and it’s a spray- HOORAY), but it’s not waterproof.


  1. Sometimes I can’t tell what you’re sketpical of. ;}

  2. Me neither.

    I generally try to avoid trusting any speculation (even if it’s science-based), except in the instances when it involves the health of my children. I’m more than happy to back away from my mistrust of Coppertone (and the rest) if anyone can prove the speculations are based on bad science or extremely inaccurate interpretations.

  3. :}

  4. I don’t understand that emoticon.

    I looked it up in the emoticon dictionary and it either means leering, bearded, tipsy, or wry smile. I’m going with wry smile? 🙂

  5. Thanks for this info. The website you linked to seems to be a great resource. I pay atention to chemicals in products and foods, so I was thrilled too have this comprehensive study/list on sun lotions. Especially because I live on the beach!

  6. […] last post about sunscreen dangers addressed some of details of EWG’s sunscreen press release, so I […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: