Posted by: Ticktock | January 15, 2009

Update: The Breakfast-Gender Effect Rejected

One of my first interviews on this blog was with British scientist Fiona Matthews, who studied the effect that a healthy breakfast diet would have on predicting the gender of future offspring.  She seemed so confident in her research when answering my questions, but now her results are being called into question.

Dr. Stanley Young of The National Institute of Statistical Sciences in the U.S. headed the reanalysis of Fiona’s research because he was skeptical of the initial findings.  His reassesment of the data revealed some flaws in the original interpretation, a fact which Fiona disputes, stating that the Americans weren’t looking at the “bigger picture”.

The infertility experts with WebMD examined both studies and sided with the Americans.  Now it looks like the ball is in Fiona’s court as to whether she can defend her research in the face of this criticism.

Well, that’s the beauty of science.  It relies on open source research that can be reanalyzed and/or replicated.  The idea that a mother’s diet could affect her unborn baby’s gender was an extraordinary claim.  It seems that, in this case, the extraordinary claim was not supported by extraordinary evidence.  Or, at least, not yet.



  1. Hey… so does that mean all that information about fathers eating alkaline/acidic foods, while mothers ate the opposite would help increases the chances or male or female offspring based on male/female sperm survival rates in alkaline/acidic environments is a load of BS?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: